(already subscribe? log in).

Nuclear ambitions grow regardless of our hawkish rhetoric

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR | Letters | SABER-RATTLING - OR NOT - TOWARD IRAN

THIS STORY APPEARED IN
Boston Articles
February 20, 2012

FOR MORE than 30 years, the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran have relentlessly persecuted religious minorities and political dissidents, led and supported a program of worldwide terror, and declared their intent to destroy Israel while threatening neighboring Arab states. Now these same leaders are engaged in an effort to build nuclear weapons.

A consensus has emerged among the United States and its allies that a nuclear Iran would pose a grave worldwide threat. James Carroll, however, ignores years of failed negotiations and Iran’s well-documented commitment to violence and terror in order to argue that hawkish rhetoric from Washington is responsible for Iran’s determination to seek nuclear weapons (“Bad option on the table,’’ Op-ed, Feb. 13). He bolsters his case by quoting Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei complaining about “America’s bullying’’ of Iran, and chastises President Obama for potentially causing “unforeseen consequences.’’

Carroll’s argument that a strong-willed response to an overt threat causes the threat itself is difficult to fathom. There is a serious policy debate underway in the United States and around the world about how far to go in stopping Iran’s nuclear program. Regrettably, Carroll squandered an opportunity to be part of it.

Lester Fagen

Boston

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|