(already subscribe? log in).

Union and its allies stand for lasting school reform, not mediocrity

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR | letters

THIS STORY APPEARED IN
Boston Articles
February 05, 2012

ROBERT HOLLAND of the Heartland Institute, a conservative think tank in Chicago, falsely suggested that we side with “mediocrity’’ in public education by opposing the Stand for Children ballot question (“Union fears ballot for way it would throw light on closed system,’’ Letters, Jan. 29). In fact, we have worked for quality schools since our founding 167 years ago.

These efforts speak for themselves: Our students are first in the country in both mathematics and English language arts. Most recently, we have been a leader in strengthening the teacher evaluation system to better identify struggling teachers and help them improve - or terminate them if they don’t. We object to the complex Stand for Children ballot question, which is seven pages long and has 11 different sections, because it would undermine that new evaluation system before it is even implemented.

This is not a case, as Holland would have it, of unions vs. reformers. Others opposed to the initiative include the Massachusetts PTA, both principals’ associations, three Massachusetts teachers of the year, and the state secretary of education. Like us, these allies are not for mediocrity, but instead are for creating reforms that last through collaboration and discussion, not misleading and divisive ballot initiatives.

Paul Toner

President

Massachusetts Teachers Association

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|