Today will see the New England Patriots playing the New York Giants in Indianapolis, in what is billed (in the lofty Roman numerals XLVI) as the 46th Super Bowl game. As the announcers will no doubt remind us over and over, the Super Bowl is one of the most-watched events of the television year; last year, Super Bowl XLV was seen by more than 111 million people, making it the most-watched television show ever. With so many people paying attention, the name “Super Bowl” seems almost understated. Why not the Amazing Tremendous Mega-Stupendous Awesome Bowl?
It may be a remnant of “Mad-Men”-era understatement, or just left over from a time where branding wasn’t the main concern of every organization, but there’s something comforting about the simplicity of the “Super Bowl” name. It’s not the “Insert Corporate Name Here Bowl,” as many of the college bowl games have become--“Taxslayer.com Gator Bowl,” anyone? Nor is it as dryly literal as, say, the PGA Players Championship. The name “Super Bowl” neatly balances the descriptive with the evocative. And it’s perhaps partly for that reason that, in less than 50 years, the event by that name has grown to seem like such a natural and solid fixture of our national calendar.
