(already subscribe? log in).

Raising Strindberg’s profile, 100 years on

STAGES

THIS STORY APPEARED IN
Boston Articles
January 27, 2012|By Joel Brown
  • Playwright August Strindberg in 1881.
Playwright August Strindberg in 1881. (COURTESY STRINDBERG MUSEUM,…)

Dark, morose, gloomy? Does the great Swedish playwright August Strindberg truly deserve his cheerless reputation?

David Krasner, an associate professor of theater at Emerson College, laughs and points to the title of a Strindberg play he’s been rehearsing: “Dance of Death.’’

“That’s pretty foreboding,’’ he says.

Krasner plays one of the leads in Sunday’s reading of the 1900 drama, the story of a combative marriage, in the Jackie Liebergott Black Box at the Paramount Center. It’s the kickoff of Boston events in the international Strindberg 2012 Festival, an effort by Strindberg scholars to lift the writer’s profile on the 100th anniversary of his death. Centennial activities in Sweden are part of the official Strindberg Year.

Strindberg’s “ruthless truthfulness is why people are put off by him,’’ Krasner says, but bleak as Strindberg could be, the thrice-married dramatist was also highly modern in his depiction of the battle between the sexes, and often very funny. His work was key to later playwrights such as Eugene O’Neill and Edward Albee.

Albee’s “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf,’’ in particular, owes a debt to “Dance of Death,’’ says Krasner, but when it comes to relations between men and women, especially in marriage, “most of modern drama, and most modern soap operas, are straight out of Strindberg.’’

“His whole idea of sexual warfare and the battle between the sexes - few if any writers ever had their fingers on the pulse of such a dynamic of desire and hate, and with that, sparks just fly in his plays,’’ says Krasner. “He didn’t have much hope in the sexual warfare. I think that’s why he gets that gloomy mark on him, in that Ibsen had a little more hope. . . . Strindberg didn’t see much hope for anybody, men or women.’’

Krasner and Mara Radulovic, a part-time member of the Emerson faculty, are the leads in this tale of power games within a bitter union - roles Ian McKellen and Helen Mirren played in the drama’s most recent Broadway revival, in 2001.

“As Strindberg would say, we’re born discontented,’’ says Scott Fielding, who directs the reading. “He’s very much attuned to this question of why are we unhappy in life and how can we be happy? Can we be happy under our own power? What is the role of God?’’

Fielding, who is also the director of the Michael Chekhov Actors Studio Boston, says Strindberg was quite contemporary in the complex psychology of his characters, with a touch that prefigures the theater of the absurd and playwrights such as Samuel Beckett and Eugène Ionesco.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|