(already subscribe? log in).
THIS STORY APPEARED IN
Boston Articles

Sprinklers add crucial layer of fire protection

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR | Letters

December 21, 2011

THE ARTICLE “Firefighters push home sprinklers: But developers say added costs too high’’ (Metro, Dec. 14) reports opponents as saying that sprinklers have not been proven to be more effective in saving lives than smoke detectors. That is simply not true.

One of the most important arguments for fire sprinklers is simple: They save lives. There is no doubt that smoke alarms have played an important role in saving lives from fire. However, smoke alarms may not provide enough protection for the three groups at highest risk of dying in a fire — young children, older adults, and people with disabilities, all of whom may not be able to get out even when a smoke alarm sounds.

Working smoke alarms cut the risk of dying in a reported home fire by about 50 percent. The risk of dying decreases by about 80 percent when sprinklers are present.

All model building codes now include home fire sprinklers as a minimum level of safety. Bringing this life-saving technology into new homes will better protect home occupants and firefighters.

Jim Shannon

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|