Life after hell in Rwanda

PHOTOGRAPHY REVIEW

Seeing victims and children of rape

August 15, 2011|By Mark Feeney, Globe Staff
  • Sylvina With Her Daughter, Marianne is up at Adams Gallery.
Sylvina With Her Daughter, Marianne is up at Adams Gallery.

INTENDED CONSEQUENCES: Rwandan Children Born of Rape

At: the Adams Gallery, Sargent Hall, Suffolk University Law School, 120 Tremont St., through Oct. 23. 617-573-8447, www.suffolk.edu/48035.html

Few people over the past three decades have experienced as many horrific scenes as the photojournalist James Nachtwey has: wars, natural disasters, crimes against humanity. Several years ago, I asked him in an interview if he could say what was the worst thing he’d seen. “Rwanda,’’ he said. He didn’t hesitate. Nor did he elaborate.

He didn’t have to. In 1994, the Hutu majority there turned on the Tutsi minority and murdered an estimated 800,000 people. That was more than 10 percent of the country’s population. To give some sense of magnitude, the equivalent figure for the United States today would be more than 31 million victims.

The extent of the genocide was so great, and the way it was carried out so brutal (machetes were a preferred weapon), that other atrocities drew less attention. Hutu militia repeatedly and violently raped thousands of Tutsi women. Many of the women became infected with HIV. It’s believed that 20,000 children were born as a result of those rapes. The women are largely ostracized for “having a child of the militia.’’

The photojournalist Jonathan Torgovnik first went to Rwanda in 2006. He began interviewing rape victims and photographing them with their children. Twenty-five of the portraits make up “Intended Consequences: Rwandan Children Born of Rape.’’ The show runs through Oct. 23 at Suffolk University Law School’s Adams Gallery.

Torgovnik presents the women and children simply, with what one might call a relaxed formality. The subjects know the camera is there. They look at Torgovnik - which is to say they look at us. They pose, but without stiffness or ostentation. Torgovnik keeps artifice, and polemic, to a minimum.

The size of the photographs, 19 inches by 19 inches, gives the subjects a greater personal presence. So does the photographs being in color. We associate black and white with a greater seriousness. It’s newsier, we assume, more real. That we do so is a quirk of technology. For decades, the means of color reproduction were either inadequate, expensive, or both. In fact, black and white abstracts and aestheticizes the reality it shows - black and white makes reality look less real.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|