Hull is moving with caution to develop Nantasket sites

July 10, 2011|By Johanna Seltz, Globe Correspondent
  • This building at left was once the beach police station; the one at right, with a totem pole in front, is used for offices.
This building at left was once the beach police station; the one at right,… (Photos by Debee Tlumacki…)

Hull officials are looking for a developer willing to sign a 99-year lease for two acres across from Nantasket Beach - land now occupied by an empty police station, a few offices, a totem pole, and storage space for state-owned plows, trash cans, lifeguard chairs, and maintenance trucks.

“It’s crazy,’’ state Representative Garrett Bradley said of the current use of the site. “They’re storing plows and stuff on waterfront property. It’s sacrilege.’’

Hull Town Manager Philip Lemnios said almost any other use would be an improvement. “It’s just kind of a void now; you’re walking along, and you hit this area that has no real public value,’’ he said.

Bradley and state Senator Robert Hedlund cosponsored legislation a year ago that gave the town of Hull permission to lease the land to a private developer. The goal was to preserve the site’s beauty and historic character while bringing economic stimulus to the area and financial benefits to the town.

A town committee has been working since then to get community input and iron out details of a request for proposals from developers. Selectmen are expected to vote on the wording this week, and officials say they could see proposals by the fall.

“It’s been a little bit like raking water up a hill, but I think we’re finally getting somewhere,’’ said Bradley, who has been frustrated by the pace of the process.

Town Planner Robert Fultz defended the timetable, saying it is important to reach out to residents and build community support. He said developers also benefit by getting a good sense of what’s acceptable to Hull.

“We had three community workshops to see what [people] want to see there, and the community was supportive of mixed-use development - commercial, residential, and government [use],’’ Fultz said. “They want “something that would be market viable, but protect the town’s historic character and the environment.’’

Any project also would have to benefit the town financially, Fultz said.

Although the state Department of Conservation and Recreation would maintain ownership of the land, the town could tax anything built there, as well as collect its share of restaurant and hotel taxes, he said. Development also would provide jobs and stimulate the local economy, he said.

Developers under consideration “would be required to submit a fiscal impact analysis, to make sure the bottom line for the town would be in the black,’’ he said.

Fultz added that the town hasn’t determined a price for the lease; that would be part of the developer’s proposal.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|