Neuroscience is a vast field, but in the end the whole enterprise is motivated by a few central questions. One of them is, "Do we have free will?" A new study, published in the journal Neuron, has shed a little more light on that question. It suggests that we might need to rethink what "free will" really means.
Until now, the most important finding about free will has come from the famous " Libet experiment," devised by Benjamin Libet in 1983. Libet sat you in a chair, stuck electrodes on your head, and put a clock and a button in front of you. Whenever you felt like it, you could push the button; your only task was to notice when, according to the clock, you'd decided to push it. Libet found that your neurons started firing well in advance of your conscious decision-making: The surge in activity, or "readiness potential," started forming almost a full second before "W," your experienced moment of decision. W, Libet suggested, wasn't the present-tense sensation of making a decision, but the past-tense sensation of already having made one. This felt, to many observers, like a blow struck against the idea of free will.

READER COMMENTS »
View reader comments » Comment on this story »