2011 Tony Awards: Honor-bound?

In nominees for best play, moral battles

June 12, 2011|By Don Aucoin, Globe Staff
  • Mark Rylance plays drug dealer Johnny Rooster Byron in Jerusalem, one of the nominees for best play.
Mark Rylance plays drug dealer Johnny Rooster Byron in Jerusalem, one of… (SARA KRULWICH/THE NEW YORK…)

NEW YORK — “Funny how people can be more than one thing, ain’t it?’’

Amid the flying shards of language in “The [Expletive] With the Hat,’’ that little aperçu emerges from the quick-moving mouth of a paroled and newly sober ex-drug dealer named Jackie (Bobby Cannavale) as he confronts his 12-step sponsor, Ralph D. (Chris Rock).

Yes, it’s funny as in disturbing, funny as in uplifting, funny as in revealing. Yet when the chips are down, Jackie has to decide what one thing — what true thing — to be.

There’s an old-fashioned principle — call it honor, for lack of a better term — underlying the four dramas up for best play at tonight’s Tony Awards, airing at 8 on Channel 4: “Hat,’’ “Good People,’’ “Jerusalem,’’ and “War Horse.’’

All four plays primarily feature working-class characters who don’t have two nickels to rub together. But the fundamental battle these characters wage is moral rather than economic: Each faces a stark personal choice in extreme circumstances, where their personal integrity is on the line, and the choice they make will define them, for good or ill. It’s not just a matter of right vs. wrong, but also of true vs. false, of finding their authentic selves while picking through a minefield of possibilities.

In Stephen Adly Guirgis’s “Hat,’’ when Jackie declines an offer of sex from Ralph D.’s wife, Victoria (Annabella Sciorra), he insists he is “not trying to be honorable,’’ but then goes on to adduce a canon of behavior that, while inchoate, clearly matters to him. “Men, even though we’re [expletive] up, we got a code,’’ he explains. “It’s a [expletive]-up code, but still, it’s a code.’’

Jackie goes on to explain to Victoria that he took a certain impulsive action against the then-unidentified title character (or, rather, against his hat) because he suspects the character “broke the code’’ by sleeping with the love of Jackie’s life. But the smooth-talking Ralph D. does not subscribe to the code, to put it mildly. In a display of sophistry aimed at tying Jackie in knots and getting himself out of a serious jam, Ralph D. poses this rhetorical (and self-justifying) question: “Why should anyone — anyone — have to live by some stupid rules that make no sense, because the fact is we’re all gonna die anyway?’’

One question hovering over “Hat’’ is whether Jackie can find the strength to forgive. But the broader issue is whether he can remain the better person he has tried to become after serving time and getting clean, or will instead respond to betrayal by taking a lethal step that will put him permanently on the wrong side of the law.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|