Dave Davies was hosting an interview on NPR’s “Fresh Air” last month, asking health policy analyst Gregg Bloche the usual questions about the high cost of health care, when he suddenly threw a lexical curveball. “If we know that a lot of the tests and treatments that we’re providing don’t really help, how do we get a handle on that?” asked Davies. “I mean, can you wean out those which aren’t effective?”
That “wean out”—yes, it’s in the transcript, too—might have been a slip of the tongue for the near-homophonic “weed out.” But within days, I heard it again, this time from a young teacher: “That’s how they wean out the worse students.” And, as usual, a bit of searching showed that it wasn’t as new or as rare as I might have guessed: There are scattered examples in news archives as far back as 1980, when The New York Times said the way to cut federal spending was “to wean out subsidies to well-to-do individuals and communities.”
READER COMMENTS »
View reader comments » Comment on this story »