Client 9: The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer

Documentary recasts the Spitzer episode

November 12, 2010|Wesley Morris, Globe Staff

It’s unclear whether the timing of “Client 9: The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer’’ is good or bad for Spitzer. He’s just started a new he-said-she-said talk show on the increasingly out-of-it CNN. Having this movie in the news dredging up the recent past — the scandal that revealed that Spitzer, the then-governor of New York, was paying for prostitutes — resumes a distraction from what’s really important: He needs a better agent. Still, documentarian Alex Gibney is eager to recast him in a bygone heroic light. “Client 9’’ isn’t an exoneration as much as it is a clarification — a botched one, but still. If Spitzer wants to be seen as remorseful, I suppose this is an ideal opportunity. His contrition is evident. He looks tight with shame. But I don’t know that Spitzer sees this movie as an opportunity to step back and look inward, since he appears to refuse to.

Having hit the brick wall of his ostensible subject’s natural humorlessness, Gibney didn’t have much choice but to put Spitzer at the center of a larger sort of national tragedy. But “Client 9’’ is high farrago. The movie’s central idea is that the airing of the governor’s indiscretions was part of what Hillary Clinton notoriously called a vast, right-wing conspiracy. Gibney argues, as others before him have, that Spitzer had so many enemies in state government and on Wall Street that, if he had secrets, it was only a matter of time until they pooled their resources and ferreted them out. It’s the very tactic that Charles Ferguson’s current financial-crisis documentary, “Inside Job,’’ advocates using to get corrupt politicians and CEOs to testify: broadcast their dirty laundry. Spitzer contributes a lot of insight to Ferguson’s documentary but, on camera, clams up on that issue.

It takes Gibney almost two hours to build his own argument regarding the airing of Spitzer’s laundry, and, having watched it twice, that length is inexplicable. Gibney has filled the movie with anyone who would talk to him — many of them are crucial to the case the movie is making. His executive foes, like the business titans Hank Greenberg and Ken Langone, both of whom are positively radioactive with schadenfreude, explain how Spitzer overstepped his bounds. The dapper Republican consultant and loony Nixon obsessive Roger Stone may have been the chief orchestrator of the leaks that made public Spitzer’s involvement with the prostitution ring. He’s mostly just radioactively tan.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|