The plan prompted swift political pushback from lawmakers fearful that jobs would be lost in their districts.
“At the end of the day, Secretary Gates and his team will have to convince members of this committee that these efforts will not weaken our nation’s defense,’’ said Representative Buck McKeon of California, the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee.
Senator Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, said he could see “no rational basis’’ for eliminating Norfolk’s Joint Forces Command, which works to improve the services’ ability to work together and find efficiencies. “In the business world, you sometimes have to spend money in order to save money,’’ said Warner.
Senator Jim Webb, a Virginia Democrat who sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the move a “step backward’’ that “could be harmful to the capabilities of the finest military in the world.’’
In a Pentagon press conference, Gates was optimistic that Congress would eventually back his plan despite lawmakers’ control of the budget. He said in the case of Virginia, the state could wind up with additional jobs if the savings found by closing Joint Forces Command enables a boost in shipbuilding.
Eliminating the Joint Forces Command would take the backing of President Obama, who applauded the overall belt-tightening in a statement yesterday but did not mention the command or two smaller offices set for closure.
“The funds saved will help us sustain the current force structure and make needed investments in modernization in a fiscally responsible way,’’ Obama said. “Change is never easy.’’
Gates had pledged earlier to cut the operating budget of the military to offset the costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and rising domestic spending.
The Joint Forces Command trains troops from all services to work together for specific missions. It tries to make sure equipment used by different services is compatible and looks for gaps in capabilities within military services that could be filled by a specially trained joint force.
Gates described his initiative as just the beginning in his hunt for inefficiencies across the Defense Department, which commands an annual budget of nearly $700 billion including war spending.