‘Art’ gives surface treatment to deep questions

July 31, 2010|Louise Kennedy, Globe Staff

PITTSFIELD — The smooth, finely crafted, and provocative surface of Yasmina Reza’s play “Art’’ resembles nothing so much as the white-on-white painting over which its three characters battle. Is it a brilliant creation worth a small fortune, full of deeper meaning invisible to all but the cognoscenti, or is it a hollow joke, an empty symbol of our intellectually empty times?

Like the fictional painting at its center, the play has certainly achieved huge success since its 1995 Paris premiere. It won the 1998 Tony Award for best play, has been translated into more than 30 languages, and has been performed all over the world. Now it’s playing at Barrington Stage Company, where its superficial attractions will surely delight summer theatergoers, but where the question of its lasting value still seems very much up for grabs.

In some ways, that’s OK. Henry Wishcamper directs the able cast skillfully, with many nice bits of characterization fleshing out Reza’s deliberately blank slates: Although her script reveals few facts about the three men besides first name, profession, and marital status, Bryan Avers, Michael Countryman, and David Garrison create distinctive personalities from the scarce data they’re given.

Garrison plays Serge, the well-off dermatologist who ignites a furious debate by paying 200,000 francs (the play is set in the pre-euro Paris of 1994) for a painting by the fictional artist Antrios — a painting that Serge insists contains many subtle shades, though his friend Marc (Countryman), an aeronautical engineer, sees only a 4-foot-by-5-foot canvas painted white, with diagonal lines, also white, barely discernible on its surface. A third friend, Yvan (Avers), who’s a textile expert turned stationery salesman and about to be married, seems not quite sure which side of the argument he’s on.

That, as it turns out, is the real crux of the play. Despite its title, “Art’’ is not so much about art as it is about friendship, and specifically male friendship of the competitive, insecure, and often passively hostile sort. Marc, we gradually gather, has served as a kind of intellectual mentor to Serge and is now enraged by his friend’s embrace of an art movement he sees as vacuous and false; Serge has admired Marc but is chafing under his air of superiority, and Yvan looks up to both of them while secretly feeling inferior (and therefore, of course, resentful, too).

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|