An American protester in Rome yesterday called the Murphy case an “incontrovertible case of pedophilia.’’
Despite the extensive and grave allegations against Murphy, Ratzinger’s deputy at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith ruled that the alleged molestation had occurred too long ago and that Murphy, by then ailing and elderly, should instead repent and be restricted in celebrating Mass.
The official, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, now the Vatican’s secretary of state, ordered the church trial halted after Murphy wrote Ratzinger a letter saying he was ill, infirm, and “simply want to live out the time that I have left in the dignity of my priesthood.’’
The New York Times broke the story yesterday, adding fuel to a swirling scandal about the way the Vatican and Benedict have handled reports of priests raping children over the years.
Yesterday a group of Americans who say they were sexually abused by clerics held a news conference outside St. Peter’s Square to denounce Benedict’s handling of the case and gave reporters church and Vatican documents on the case.
Afterward, Italian police detained four Americans because they did not have a permit for the news conference and suggested they get a lawyer in case a judge decided to press charges, the Americans said.
“We’ve spent more time in the police station than Father Murphy did,’’ Peter Isely, Milwaukee director of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, said after his release.
The Vatican defended its handling of the Murphy case, saying in the Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, that there was no coverup and denouncing what it said was a “clear and despicable intention’’ to strike at Benedict “at any cost.’’
The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, issued a statement noting that the Murphy case had reached the Vatican only in 1996, some 20 years after the diocese first learned of the allegations. He also said that Murphy died two years later, in 1998, and that there was nothing in the church’s handling of the matter that precluded any civil action from being taken against him.
READER COMMENTS »
View reader comments » Comment on this story »