Bay has some things to say

March 01, 2010|On baseball, Nick Cafardo, Globe Staff

PORT ST. LUCIE, Fla. - Jason Bay looks much different in the blue Mets warm-up jersey with the big No. 44 on his back. And while he has moved on from the Red Sox and is about to shoulder the burden of providing power to an anemic offense, some of the scars of a tough offseason probably will stay with him until he starts playing for New York for real.

Bay signed a four-year, $66 million contract (with a fifth-year option) with the Mets after he and the Red Sox couldn’t work out a deal because of the player’s unwillingness to go along with a medical provision protecting the team if he missed time because of shoulder and knee injuries. Bay, who had been in talks with Boston on an extension since last summer, was quick to note what he called untruths that were attributed to him upon signing with the 70-92 Mets.

“Would I have gone back [to Boston]? Yeah, I think so,’’ he said. “But I’d be back on my terms. During the season I was part of the Red Sox, and once the offseason came I didn’t consider myself part of the Red Sox. We kept in dialogue and they were a team on my list. I felt at that point I had a little more power, or at least it was going to be my decision what my direction was.

“I had teams on the list and I had my pluses and minuses, and Boston had its pluses because I’d been there and I’d understood how to play there.’’

In the end it was about two sides who each would not budge from what they believed.

Team physician Thomas Gill felt the Sox needed to protect themselves, much like they had regarding J.D Drew’s shoulder and John Lackey’s elbow. The Sox were willing to give Bay three guaranteed years and a fourth with medical protection language. Gill and the Sox’ medical team saw red flags; those Bay got second and third opinions from did not. The Mets weren’t bothered by the medical issues and signed Bay, much as they had done five years before with Pedro Martinez.

“I could see a thousand medical people and they might all agree on the same thing, but if the guy there [Gill] doesn’t see it that way, that’s their prerogative,’’ Bay said. “Things got out, and it was painted as me having sour grapes. By no means do I want to portray it that way. But what bothered me is now the perception was I was damaged goods, even though three doctors determined I wasn’t.

“I’m not saying they’re right or wrong, but I would hope others would take that into consideration.’’

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|