Little dead schoolhouse

Diane Ravitch says public education is being sabotaged by reforms focusing on testing and choice

February 28, 2010|Kate Tuttle
(Page 3 of 3)

Among Ravitch’s other targets is school choice, especially the charter school movement embraced by both free-market reformers and parents weary of the problems at their local public schools. Championed early on by teacher union head Albert Shanker as a kind of laboratory in which the most innovative teachers could try new ideas, nurture students requiring extra support, and address specific community needs, charter schools were quickly adopted by conservatives as a way to sidestep governmental and union regulations. Varying widely in quality - predictably, one person’s cutting through the red tape was another person’s hiring unqualified teachers - charter schools have nonetheless multiplied nationwide, with enthusiastic support from both Democratic and Republican leaders. This pattern is concerning, Ravitch argues, because “choice schools” siphon off both funding and the most motivated students, especially in urban districts, a trend she warns will “leave regular public schools with the most difficult students to educate, thus creating a two-tier system of widening inequality.”

Ravitch ends her book with a strong plea for sensible, thoughtful educational reform. It’s not a thrilling read (Ravitch’s prose at times echoes the criticism she levels at textbooks for their “leaden paragraphs”), and there are some off notes (her take on the ease of solving culture wars over curriculum borders on the naïve), but this is important stuff - not only for those of us with children in the public schools, but for anyone who worries about the country’s future. Our children don’t have Sputnik to worry about, but what with the global recession, climate change, religious and ethnic conflict, and so on, they could use all the help they can get.

Kate Tuttle is a writer living near Boston.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|