‘Swan Thieves’ is an art-filled, if not artful, novel

January 12, 2010|Clea Simon, Globe Correspondent

Elizabeth Kostova burst onto the pop literary scene in 2005 with “The Historian,’’ a fat and juicy historical novel that wove vampire lore into contemporary mystery with aplomb. Since then, fans have been drooling in anticipation of her next blockbuster pastiche. Such excitement may persuade the devoted to jump on her new work, “The Swan Thieves,’’ but despite some exquisite writing, the book itself is strangely lifeless and unlikely to win new converts.

Kostova employs many of the same devices in this second novel that she used in “The Historian.’’ Once again, letters from the past are interspersed with the current action and function as clues, and these letters also tie together alternating narratives. Both are historical mysteries, though in “The Swan Thieves’’ Kostova switches her focus from Eastern Europe to 19th-century France.

In the new book, the contemporary story focuses on an enigmatic, brilliant painter, Robert Oliver, who has been hospitalized after attempting to attack Gilbert Thomas’s painting “Leda’’ in the National Gallery in Washington. His attending psychiatrist, Dr. Andrew Marlowe, is also an artist, and this connection prompts the doctor to learn all he can about his patient by interviewing those closest to him - and to make sense of Oliver’s most recent project, a series of paintings that all feature an intriguing dark-haired woman.

As part of his inquiry, Marlowe also studies some letters Oliver has been obsessively rereading, correspondence between two painters, a young woman and her husband’s uncle, from the 1870s. Their tragic, star-crossed story - involving both art and parenthood - may hold the key to mysteries past and present.

With the bulk of the narrative carried by the first-person monologues of Marlowe and the two main women in Oliver’s life, his ex-wife, Kate, and his discarded younger lover, Mary Bertison, voice is essential. Unfortunately, Kostova flubs two out of three.

Her Kate Oliver is a compelling narrator, believable as she relates her early courtship by the artist and her later disillusionment as she gives up her own painting to care for their children, losing his interest along the way. But Marlowe is wooden. An aging bachelor, he spends too much time dwelling on his waning attractiveness to younger women, which serves to set up the plot but feels inappropriately self-conscious. His sections provide necessary action, but without any real thrust. And when Mary makes her appearance, she has little to offer and is distinguished only by a series of quirks, such as calling her mother “Muzzy,’’ rather than character traits.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|