“It is not exaggerating to say the world has escaped a disaster,’’ Ter Horst said, calling the situation a “professional’’ Al Qaeda terror attack.
Amsterdam’s Schiphol has 15 body scanners, each costing more than $200,000. But until now, neither the European Union nor the United States has approved the routine use of the scanners at European airports.
A key European legislator urged the European Union to begin rapidly installing the new equipment across the 27-nation bloc, but no other European nations immediately followed the Dutch move.
Body scanners that view underneath clothing have been available for years, but privacy advocates say they are a “virtual strip search’’ because they display an image of the body onto a computer screen.
New software, however, eliminates that problem by projecting a stylized image rather than an actual picture onto a computer screen, highlighting the area of the body where objects are concealed in pockets or under the clothing.
Ter Horst said the scanners probably would have alerted security guards to the materials concealed in Abdulmutallab’s underwear and prevented him from boarding the Northwest flight.
At least two scanners in Amsterdam have been experimentally using the less-invasive software since late November, and the Dutch said those will be put into use immediately. All other scanners will be upgraded within three weeks.
But the 15 scanners will not cover the 25 to 30 flights a day that leave Amsterdam for US destinations, and passengers at gates without one will be patted down. Schiphol is waiting for a government directive on whether to buy more machines, airport spokeswoman Kathelijn Vermeulen said.
In the preliminary report issued yesterday, the Dutch government called the plan to blow up the Detroit-bound aircraft “professional’’ but said its execution was “amateurish.’’
