Turning around and trading Ellsbury would result in a steal for Padres

December 17, 2009|On baseball, Nick Cafardo
(Page 3 of 3)

There actually is more pressure on the Padres than the Red Sox to get a Gonzalez deal done. The Padres have a big-market, deep-pocket team interested in Gonzalez. The Padres have firsthand knowledge of the inventory. Will they let this opportunity slip by? Will they take the chance that Boston is interested in Gonzalez at the trading deadline, or that there would be another deep-pocket team interested in Gonzalez after the season ends? Even if the Mets, who need a first baseman, wanted Gonzalez, do they have the minor league players that could satisfy Hoyer and McLeod? Probably not. Seattle? The Mariners were interested in Gonzalez at the trading deadline this past season. They have done quite a bit this offseason with the signing of Chone Figgins and the trade for Cliff Lee. They’ve given up prospects. While they would be able to absorb Gonzalez’s $4.5 million and $5.5 million salaries the next two years, what about after that? They’re about to get involved with big-money, long-term deals for Felix Hernandez and Lee.

The popular and safe move for the Padres is not to deal Gonzalez. Nobody in San Diego would blame Hoyer for holding onto this player. But then, if he doesn’t have a place to ship him next year and winds up getting nothing but draft picks, that wouldn’t be good.

That’s why Epstein is right to say he is not desperate. He should not be desperate enough to trade one of the best athletes in major league baseball.

Nick Cafardo can be reached at cafardo@globe.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|