Thriller holds back but still delivers

July 09, 2009|Ethan Gilsdorf

Can a thriller be both literary (as in good for you) and thrilling? Such is the question posed by J. Robert Lennon’s “Castle,’’ a slim psychological study of an emotionally scarred protagonist and his investigation into his past.

Under enigmatic circumstances, Eric Loesch returns to his hometown of Gerrysburg in upstate New York, “population 2,310 and falling.’’ He buys a beaten-down house on a remote parcel of forestland, ostensibly to fix it up. But it quickly becomes evident that Loesch, who narrates the story, also intends to rebuild himself. Somewhere in this shabby town and the impenetrable woods, Loesch both hopes for, and seems to dread, the discovery of a missing life fragment that might lead to self-understanding. (Spoiler alert: The war in Iraq holds one key.)

But as teller of this tale, Loesch withholds information, from himself and the reader. He’s more than an unreliable narrator. He’s self-deluded, in denial, shut off to his feelings, and not particularly sympathetic. The reader learns to not entirely trust Loesch, and in this mostly gripping novel this suspicion creates currents of tension and frustration.

Through roughly the first third of the book, about all he admits to is a career in “infrastructure and information.’’ In detail, we hear of his efforts at home improvement and his unexplained forays into the woods. This is a task-oriented, tightly wound guy. His internal voice is full of archaic, emotionally drained turns of phrase such as “in my temporary employ.’’ After repeated encounters with an albino deer on his property, he notes, “I am not the kind of person who subscribes to half-baked, magical ideas. . . . I have been trained to do what I am told, and to report the facts as I find them.’’

In literature, this “I’’ viewfinder is an accepted convention; it’s fiction’s best-guess construct that passes for the protagonist’s mind-soul-commentary running behind the voiced self. But this limited window occasionally gets Lennon into trouble. Loesch may claim he is not a self-reflective person, but our uptight hero is insightful, when he chooses to be so. As the story gets underway, and as we intuit more about Loesch’s back story (estranged relationship with sister, unresolved demise of parents, and worse), one begins to feel the author willfully clouding the narrator’s mind when it serves to infuse the plot with “Silence of the Lambs’’-style psycho-tension.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|