Angels & Demons

Unoriginal sin: In 'Angels & Demons,' Ron Howard exorcises what's best about the book

May 15, 2009|Wesley Morris, Globe Staff
(Page 3 of 3)

The delight of Brown's book was entirely backhanded. "Angels & Demons" was crap, but it was exhilarating crap. He wrote with riveting badness. Langdon was pompous, Brown condescending, and the sentences purple enough to give Prince pause! Watching what Howard has done with the book - covering up the lewdness, blunting the snobbery, and spackling the amazing plot holes - is dismaying.

This adaptation has the stink of superiority about it. It thinks that by deleting all the sex and playing up the theological struggles it's somehow better than the novel. But Brown writes with glee and gusto, like a man who recently discovered that fingers applied to a keyboard produce words. The novel was a 137-chapter typing spree.

Howard simply isn't as good a filmmaker as Brown is a blissfully terrible writer. He hasn't directed with that kind of joy since "Splash." The self-mocking sense of humor he uses in the political ads he stars in and cameos he makes (Howard recently put in a hilarious appearance in Jamie Foxx's video for "Blame It") never surfaces in his movies. His Oscar has only exacerbated his addiction to prestige commercialism. It's a real problem. He can't make trash or art.

Wesley Morris can be reached at wmorris@globe.com. For more on movies, go to www.boston.com/movienation

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|