Maine event

From large installations to smaller works, this biennial packs a punch

May 08, 2009|Sebastian Smee, Globe Staff

PORTLAND, Maine - Unusually sprightly and stimulating, the "2009 Portland Museum of Art Biennial" is nevertheless the result of a ruthlessly heavy-handed selection process. Three judges, like a trio of grim reapers, spent two days scything at 3,800 works of art until they were left with just 29.

If that's what it takes, I'm all for it. Exhibitions of this kind are rarely satisfying. Navigating them is like stumbling into the perfumery of a big department store. Clashing aromas give you an instant headache, making meaningful discrimination all but impossible. But something about this biennial, featuring work by artists associated with Maine, felt unified, in spite of its variety, and easy to swallow. It helped that it had a lot of fine work in it.

Two big gestures dominate. The first, a life-size re-creation of a hermit's two-story wooden cabin by Ethan Hayes-Chute, takes up a large part of the museum's Great Hall. Hayes-Chute, an artist in his late 20s, resides in both Berlin, Germany, and Freeport, Maine. Walking into his cabin, made with materials salvaged from dumpsters, construction sites, and recycling centers, puts you briefly on edge, like an innocent bystander unwittingly transformed into a voyeuristic intruder. But the overall impact of the installation is strangely slight.

Aesthetically, the work belongs to a phenomenon in recent art best referred to as "literalism." If the phenomenon had congealed into a movement, its manifesto might contain exhortations along the lines of: "Don't paint me a shark, give me a real one!" (Damien Hirst) or "Don't sculpt your head with clay, make it with your own frozen blood" (Marc Quinn).

The tendency has roots, of course, in Marcel Duchamp's readymades, but it has taken on spectacular new dimensions of late and has produced a lot of big impact art, sometimes with fascinating philosophical implications.

Unfortunately, although Hayes-Chute has the spectacular side of things well in hand, there is something about his reconstruction that fails to take flight. Just as the most interesting atheists have a secretly religious bent (and vice versa), the best literalists tend to harbor a secret love of metaphor, allegory, and symbol. Hayes-Chute's "Hermitage" is missing such hidden dimensions (or if they are there, they're rather too well hidden).

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|