Stephen Cable, an opponent of gay marriage and a member of the Vermont Marriage Advisory Council, said, "All eyes are now on Vermont," he said. "There will be a heightened awareness of gay marriage, and I expect there will be a bill written on the first day of the legislative session."
Beth Robinson, a Middlebury lawyer who chairs the Freedom to Marry Task Force, said she, too, believes the California decision will be important to Vermont.
"The significance of this ruling for Vermont cannot be overstated," Robinson said. "It is certainly meaningful to have this validated by another state's supreme court."
The 4-to-3 California ruling struck down the state laws against same-sex marriages, and the court found that California's domestic partnerships law, similar to the civil unions law passed by Vermont in 2000, does not go far enough to provide equality for same-sex couples.
"The California court recognized that it's not enough to create a separate legal status like civil unions," said Robinson.
Much of the attention on the same-sex marriage issue is expected to remain focused on California, at least through the November election. That's when voters in the nation's most populous state are expected to weigh in on an amendment to the California Constitution that would reverse the court's decision and make same-sex marriage illegal.
Gay marriage opponents have asked the California court to delay the effective date of its decision until after the election. Normally, such decisions take effect about 30 days after they are issued, meaning if the delay is not granted, same-sex couples in California could plan June weddings.
The Rev. Craig Bensen of Cambridge, whose group Take It To The People opposes gay marriage, called the California court decision "raw, arrogant, judicial activism in the face of the will of the people."
He predicted it "will be overturned by a citizen's initiative in a few months, which will put an end to same-sex marriage in California. The Supreme Court decision does not mean much."
READER COMMENTS »
View reader comments » Comment on this story »