Reporter challenges ruling over sources in anthrax case

Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit judges questioned whether that order went too far or whether Hatfill really needs the information, since his attorneys have asked for a trial date.

"You've got enough to go to trial. You think you can win," Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg told Hatfill's lawyer. "Why is more evidence critical to the case? That seems to be a contradiction."

Before ordering a reporter to identify a source, judges normally balance the need for the information against the need for a reporter to protect his or her sources.

Five people were killed and 17 sickened when anthrax was mailed to Capitol Hill lawmakers and members of the media just weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Locy's lawyer, Robert C. Bernius, told the judges that upholding the contempt ruling would prevent reporters from being able to report on important issues like the anthrax attacks.

After the attacks, Attorney General John Ashcroft called Hatfill "a person of interest" in the investigation and stories by various reporters including Locy followed. Hatfill had worked at the Army's infectious diseases laboratory from 1997 to 1999. The anthrax attacks remain unsolved.

Locy, a former reporter with the Associated Press and The Boston Globe, now teaches journalism at West Virginia University.