On Eloquence
By Denis Donoghue
Yale University, 199 pp., $27.50
The distinguished literary critic Denis Donoghue takes issue with the way literature is treated in the university nowadays, which is to say, as fodder for a political-theoretical agenda in which the theorist often grinds the text along with his or her ax. Donoghue prefers a different approach, one so conservative it seems revolutionary: reading a literary work for the pleasure of what it says and how it says it.
Eloquence, in Donoghue's analysis of canonical and not-so-canonical texts, turns out to be one of those tricky concepts about which we can say with confidence only that we know it when we see it, or feel it, or hear it. There is eloquence of gesture, he tells us, and, borrowing from Eliot, eloquence of "incantation." Eloquence is style, but more so. "Eloquent" is not the same as "elegant," which we call a piece of writing when we are impressed but not moved; and not the same as "articulate," which, as a politician recently learned, can be backhanded praise, too easily implying that one expected the opposite.