Good grief, what a muse

Charles Schulz, the lonely soul behind the iconic 'Peanuts,' reflected America in the comic strip's mix of friendliness and isolation

October 21, 2007|Carlo Wolff

Schulz and Peanuts: A Biography
By David Michaelis
HarperCollins, 566 pp., illustrated, $34.95

Between 1950 and 2000, when Charles M. Schulz died of cancer, his comic strip, "Peanuts," seemed to be everywhere. Its short, round-headed characters, operating in panels with lots of white space, seemed limited emotionally, though fans could read whatever they wanted into them; the strip was appropriately grudging of line and word. "Peanuts" made "Sparky" Schulz, a Midwesterner of austere origins, sharp opinions, stubborn grudges, and easily bruised feelings, the most widely syndicated cartoonist in history.

Like his strip, Schulz was regular, purposeful and, in some ways, liberating. At the same time, he was a fundamentalist Christian, a prude, and a teetotaler. How the superficially guileless but driven Schulz and his sophisticated, outwardly innocent strip dovetailed occupy this exceptional biography by David Michaelis, a perceptive cultural observer with great powers of interpretation. Michaelis subtitles this "A Biography" because it's about both Schulz and his creation. By the end of this long, affectionate yet critical work, which embeds 240 "Peanuts" strips in its text, you understand why Schulz ruled that "Peanuts" cease when he did. All reruns since 2000, it remains inimitable.

It also remains deeply American in its wistfulness. When Schulz moved west with Joyce, his strong-willed first wife, he tuned into his loneliness, the wellspring of his art. By introducing the character of Lucy (who shared some attributes with Joyce) to the strip, he broadened it:

"Before Lucy, the strip had been a brilliant ongoing marginal doodle; Schulz saw it as 'tiny world,' " Michaelis writes. "Drawn in Colorado Springs at the edge of the Rockies, "Peanuts" gave a sense of America the way "Huckleberry Finn" does. Americans believe in friendship, in community, in fairness; but in the end, they are dominated by their apartness, their individual isolation - an isolation that went very deep, in Schulz, in his new household, and in his characters, who turned from the disappointments dished out in the strip's fourth frame to look directly at the reader."

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|