Last season, the writers seemed to lean toward the latter, and their efforts to make Wisteria Lane sound exciting grew ever more absurd. Amid the accidental billionaires, personality-changing amnesia, and teenage sons turned male prostitutes, the show's ratings slipped a bit. Perhaps American viewers were finally getting a headache.
Based on tomorrow's fourth-season premiere, the writers seem intent on bringing the show - at least slightly - back to earth. The plot is mainly driven by emotions here: Gabrielle and Carlos's renewed love interest, Bree's shame at her teenage children's mistakes, Lynette's efforts to keep her cancer a secret. The twists largely center on hormones and babies.
It feels a bit unnerving that a show once heralded as a showcase for women of a certain age has resorted to making so many of them pregnant. Yet that's a recurring theme: pregnancies real and, in the case of Bree, inexplicably faked. Meanwhile, the show maintains its split personality in maddening ways: We're supposed to poke fun of suicide, in a plot involving Edie (Nicolette Sheridan), then pull our hankies to face Lynnette's cancer head-on.
Felicity Huffman, as Lynette, has the acting chops to pull off her character's realistic desperation. But the subplot seems a waste; this show has always succeeded best as comedy. Susan's neuroses wear thin quickly, but Teri Hatcher's twitches do provide for some happy relief - there's a very funny sight gag tomorrow night involving a gynecologist. And Marcia Cross's Bree is far more fun when she's protecting the integrity of her fake pregnancy suit than when she's moaning about her own maternal mistakes.