Here's a pitch for more strong-arm tactics

May 04, 2007|Bob Ryan, Globe Columnist

A month and change of the baseball season is in the books.

1. PITCHING, PITCHING, PITCHING

'Tis said you can never be too rich or too thin. I can't verify either, but here's something you can take to the financial institution of your choice: You can never have too much pitching!

I must respectfully disagree with Julian Tavarez, who is on record as saying the Red Sox don't need Roger Clemens. Were I the fifth starter on this team, I, too, might lobby for a career 348-game winner with seven Cys to stay home and play catch with the neighborhood youngins. But were I Theo Epstein, I'd be waving John Henry's golden checkbook in Roger's face, if for no other reason than if I've got him, my friend Brian Cashman doesn't. Beyond that, YOU CAN NEVER HAVE TOO MUCH PITCHING.

This is neither 2003 nor 2004, when the Red Sox scored 961 and 949 runs, respectively. The 2007 Sox are an OK offensive team, nothing more. They've had some tepid nights at the plate already, and you should prepare yourself for at least a half-dozen more shutouts or 3/4-hit nights, and not always against a primo starter, either.

Pitching has placed the 2007 Sox at the top of the AL East, and pitching is what will keep them there. But pitchers are fragile creatures (see Bombers, Bronx) and two of Terry Francona's starters were alive and kicking when the 1967 Sox revived baseball hereabouts. Stuff happens (See Bombers, Bronx). You're always a tweak or angry oblique muscle away from a Kyle Snyder start or two (not that this would be the worst thing in the world).

If Roger Clemens is available, get him. If someone holds a fire sale for a quality pitcher after the All-Star break, get him. Give Tito so many quality pitchers he'll have to hold a lottery to see who gets a playoff start, or even gets a spot on the postseason roster.

More teams that couldn't hit have won with great pitching than vice versa.

End of story.

2. T-E-A-M, YEA, TEAM!

There isn't a soul among us who had a clue that as the Red Sox jumped to a 17-9 record that an indispensable player would be Hideki Okajima. Nor is there a soul among us who would have predicted Alex Cora would have made so many direct contributions to victories during those 26 games.

So?

So it's always nice to be reminded that what will always separate sport from entertainment is this wonderful element of the unknown. We do not know how the games will turn out and we do not know who will determine the outcome.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|