Seeing a pattern

From cosmology to geology, science inspires abstract art at DeCordova

February 02, 2007|Ken Johnson, Globe Staff

In Sarah Walker’s vertiginously expansive paintings, geological patterns, scabby organic patches, and angular networks of crystalline lattice are layered over bright orange lines traversing deep blue space. Up close you see that the forms of many elements are elaborated in intricate detail; they look as if they were derived from photographs made by specialized scientific cameras.

These complicated, futuristic paintings are among the most impressive works in ‘‘Big Bang! Abstract Art for the 21st Century,’’ an exhibition at the DeCordova Museum and Sculpture Park. Featuring 15 artists who live in or have been active in New England, the show presents abstract paintings said to have been inspired by patterns and structures discovered by science or produced by technology.

As DeCordova curator Nick Capasso announces in an introductory wall text, ‘‘Big Bang! puts forth abstract paintings that address the structures of the universe, the mind, and the technologies that link them — art for the Information Age!’’ A museum wall label explains that Walker’s paintings were inspired by research into cosmology, neurology, computer science, meteorology, geology, and other fields. Similarly exotic preoccupations animate many other paintings in the show.

Making art appear more meaningful and relevant by relating it to some other field of study is a strategy that’s become all too common among artists and curators of the postmodern era. But what Capasso’s exciting title and rhetoric can’t disguise is that the kind of neatly crafted, mildly idiosyncratic, optically catchy, all-over pattern painting his exhibition mostly presents is not the rebirth of abstract art he claims it to be, but a familiar, commercially and academically well-established style. Though absorbing to behold, Walker’s paintings, too, are undermined by a suave designer sensibility. They might make excellent illustrations in a popular science magazine.

Too many of the artists included rely on some routinized additive process. Julie Miller draws zillions of tiny, colored circles on paper; Jon Petro paints countless tight coils on large and extra-large canvases; Reese Inman covers surfaces with exactingly gridded, slightly raised dots. Biology, particle physics, and cybernetics may be evoked, but seeing a lot of this kind of atomized work gets pretty monotonous.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|