US downplays reported plan for strike on Iran

April 10, 2006|Nedra Pickler, Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- The White House sought yesterday to dampen the idea of a US military strike on Iran, saying the United States is conducting ''normal defense and intelligence planning" as President Bush seeks a diplomatic solution to Tehran's suspected nuclear weapons program.

Administration officials -- from Bush on down -- have left open the possibility of a military response if Iran does not end its nuclear ambitions. Several reports published yesterday said the administration was studying options for military strikes; one account, in the New Yorker magazine, raised the possibility of using nuclear bombs against Iran's underground nuclear sites.

Jack Straw, the British foreign secretary, called the idea of a nuclear strike ''completely nuts."

Dan Bartlett, counselor to Bush, cautioned against reading too much into administration planning. ''The president's priority is to find a diplomatic solution to a problem the entire world recognizes," Bartlett said yesterday. ''And those who are drawing broad, definitive conclusions based on normal defense and intelligence planning are ill informed and are not knowledgeable of the administration's thinking on Iran."

Specialists say US forces are preoccupied with Iraq and Afghanistan and an attack against Iran could inflame US problems in the Muslim world.

Straw, in an interview with the BBC, said Britain would not launch a preemptive strike on Iran and he was as ''certain as he could be" that the United States also would not. He said he strongly suspects Iran is developing a civil nuclear capability that also could be used for nuclear weapons, but there is ''no smoking gun."

He called military action ''an infinitely worse option and there's no justification for it."

The UN Security Council has demanded that Iran suspend its uranium enrichment program. But Iran has refused to halt its nuclear activity, saying the small-scale enrichment project was strictly for research, not weapons.

Bush has emphasized that diplomacy is always preferable, but he has defended his administration's strike-first policy against terrorists and other enemies.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|