A defining figure

Final volume of trilogy corrects this era's misconceptions about the now-celebrated Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

January 15, 2006|Eric Arnesen

At Canaan's Edge: America in the King Years 1965-1968
By Taylor Branch
Simon & Schuster, 1,039 pp., $35

The civil rights movement that climaxed in 1965 has achieved mythic status, as has its most prominent leader, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. To some degree, King has undergone a secular canonization; his dream of an America that transcends color has, over the decades, been claimed by right and left alike. Two tremendous legislative achievements -- the 1964 Civil Rights Act and 1965 Voting Rights Act -- serve as fundamental affirmations of our nation's collective ability to live up to its proclaimed ideals, however belatedly. Depicting the civil rights saga as an uplifting, reassuring moral tale, however, comes at the cost of historical precision. It is only by forgetting -- or erasing -- so much that the saga is rendered safe and hence culturally usable.

With the publication of ''At Canaan's Edge" -- the final volume in award-winning writer Taylor Branch's trilogy, ''America in the King Years" -- there should be no good excuse for the perennial substitution of myth for the far messier stuff of history. Numerous other writers, particularly David Garrow, Adam Fairclough, and Nick Kotz, have covered much of this ground before. But Branch's massive and deeply impressive study is bound to attract new and large audiences, and rightly so. Like the times he covers in these pages, the story he skillfully tells so well is unceasingly fascinating and dramatic.

And depressing. The years from 1965 to 1968 witnessed not only the persistence of substantial white violence against grass-roots black activists in the South but the outbreaks of white violence against activists who turned their attention to racial discrimination in the North as well. The federal government's protection of those on the front line of the struggle remained weak at best, fueling the radicalization of younger activists and the general disillusionment of many black urbanites. In retrospect, the changes effected by the 1964 and 1965 laws appear dramatic and substantive; at the time, for those suffering the continued taunts, assaults, arrests, and ''combat fatigue" associated with unending protests, the pace of change appeared glacial. Behind the scenes, the Federal Bureau of Investigation did everything it could to make life difficult for civil rights activists, refusing to take action against brutal Southern white police, declining to inform black leaders of real threats against them, spreading nasty stories (some true, many false) about key movement leaders to politicians and the press, and infiltrating and actively disrupting their efforts.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|