Casting coup buoys mixed 'Menagerie'

January 12, 2005|Globe Correspondent

Any production of "The Glass Menagerie" is its own metaphor. The play is lovely but delicate; one false move, and it can lie in shards. The script itself, however, is pretty much indestructible: At 60 years of age, and set a decade earlier, it plays as timeless as ever. Tennessee Williams allowed for imaginative latitude in the staging, but in the Lyric Stage's current rendition, gimmicky directorial devices too often intrude on the mood.

Installing a working fire escape against a backdrop photo of many others, tangled like kudzu, is a good idea. In Janie E. Howland's well-conceived set, not only does the image serve to underscore how far the Wingfield family has fallen, it allows Tom (Vincent Ernest Siders) to drop the ladder to prowl warily into his past and, when the time comes, escape back up.

Director Eric C. Engel's most effective choice was casting this extraordinary African-American actor -- winner of a 2004 Elliot Norton Award -- as the central character. It's harrowing to imagine what the Wingfields' socioeconomic status would have been in the real world of the 1930s had the family been interracial, but we're not required to make that leap. In today's world, audiences can be trusted to respond to the personal truths a gifted actor can bring to the stage. As Tom, Siders lightens his voice and pitches his body slightly forward: He's halfway gone. And, perhaps in homage to the autobiographical source of the restlessness that Williams summons, Siders gives the impression that the "adventure" Tom hungers for isn't limited to the derring-do he witnesses at the movies. Siders makes such emotional vectors as Tom's deadening life in the shoe factory and his affection for his afflicted sister painfully real.

In antithesis, Engel's worst move is miking Amanda (Nancy E. Carroll) and Laura (Emily Sophia Knapp) in order to give certain lines an echo-chamber effect, akin to sonic italicizing. The effect is disruptive, and the wiring -- all too obvious in the Lyric's intimate space -- makes the two women look as if they're ready to rip into a song from "Rent."

That's a shame because Carroll's delivery, in particular, is as finely nuanced as one could hope for. She skirts the temptation to overplay Amanda's fluttery-female side: This is a desperate woman. Again and again, when Amanda's not rhapsodizing about her children's putative potential, Carroll's grim mouth reflects as much defeat as determination. This Amanda isn't hateful and controlling, just cornered.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|