Patents on human organisms barred

November 25, 2003|Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- The US Patent Office would be barred from issuing patents on human organisms, such as genetically engineered embryos, under an agreement reached by lawmakers yesterday.

Representative Dave Weldon, Republican of Florida, a medical doctor who sponsored the provision to be included in a major spending bill, said it would codify existing Patent Office rules that human organisms are not patentable subject matter.

Weldon said an agreement was worked out with senators to make clear, in a report accompanying the provision, that the patent ban would not interfere with stem cell research.

The provision would ban patents for genetically engineered human embryos, fetuses, and human beings, but would not affect patents on genes, cells, tissue, and other biological products. It would not stop scientists from seeking patents for the procedures or methods of creating a biological product.

US Patent and Trademark Office director James Rogan, in a letter last week to Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Ted Stevens of Alaska, said his office viewed the Weldon amendment as "fully consistent with USPTO's policy on the non-patentability of human life-forms."

He said the measure gave "unequivocal congressional backing" for a rule "refusing to grant any patent containing a claim that encompasses any member of the species Homo sapiens at any stage of development."

Weldon said in a recent floor speech that his amendment would leave the Patent Office free to address new or borderline issues. As an example, he noted that the Patent Office does grant patents in cases where an animal has been modified to include a few human genes so it can produce a human protein or antibody.

Weldon was the sponsor earlier this year of legislation that would impose a total ban on all human cloning. The bill passed the House but has stalled in the Senate.

Advertisement
Advertisement
|
|
|
|